Yes — but with an important distinction:The field equations are often linear for free fields, but interacting QFT is not linear.\boxed{\text{The field equations are often linear for free fields, but interacting QFT is not linear.}}The field equations are often linear for free fields, but interacting QFT is not linear.​

Let’s do a few concrete Weyl-vector examples.

1. Expand pμσμp_\mu\sigma^\mupμ​σμ

Useσμ=(I,σx,σy,σz)\sigma^\mu=(I,\sigma_x,\sigma_y,\sigma_z)σμ=(I,σx​,σy​,σz​)

and, with metric (+,,,)(+,-,-,-)(+,−,−,−),pμ=(E,px,py,pz)p_\mu=(E,-p_x,-p_y,-p_z)pμ​=(E,−px​,−py​,−pz​)

Sopμσμ=EIpxσxpyσypzσzp_\mu\sigma^\mu = E I – p_x\sigma_x – p_y\sigma_y – p_z\sigma_zpμ​σμ=EI−px​σx​−py​σy​−pz​σz​

Example: particle moving in the zzz-direction:pμ=(E,0,0,p)p^\mu=(E,0,0,p)pμ=(E,0,0,p)

Thenpμσμ=EIpσzp_\mu\sigma^\mu = E I-p\sigma_zpμ​σμ=EI−pσz​ =(Ep00E+p)= \begin{pmatrix} E-p & 0\\ 0 & E+p \end{pmatrix}=(E−p0​0E+p​)

Similarly,pμσˉμ=EI+pσz=(E+p00Ep)p_\mu\bar{\sigma}^\mu = E I+p\sigma_z = \begin{pmatrix} E+p & 0\\ 0 & E-p \end{pmatrix}pμ​σˉμ=EI+pσz​=(E+p0​0E−p​)


2. Massless right-handed Weyl equation

For a massless right-handed spinor,pμσμψR=0p_\mu\sigma^\mu \psi_R=0pμ​σμψR​=0

Using the zzz-direction result:(Ep00E+p)(ab)=0\begin{pmatrix} E-p & 0\\ 0 & E+p \end{pmatrix} \begin{pmatrix} a\\ b \end{pmatrix} =0(E−p0​0E+p​)(ab​)=0

For a massless particle,E=pE=pE=p

so(0002E)(ab)=0\begin{pmatrix} 0 & 0\\ 0 & 2E \end{pmatrix} \begin{pmatrix} a\\ b \end{pmatrix} =0(00​02E​)(ab​)=0

This gives2Eb=02E b=02Eb=0

sob=0b=0b=0

ThereforeψR=(10)\boxed{ \psi_R = \begin{pmatrix} 1\\ 0 \end{pmatrix} }ψR​=(10​)​

up to normalization.

This is spin-up along the direction of motion.

So a right-handed massless Weyl spinor has positive helicity:h=+12\boxed{ h=+\frac12}h=+21​​


3. Massless left-handed Weyl equation

For left-handed spinors,pμσˉμψL=0p_\mu\bar{\sigma}^\mu \psi_L=0pμ​σˉμψL​=0

Usingpμσˉμ=(E+p00Ep)p_\mu\bar{\sigma}^\mu = \begin{pmatrix} E+p & 0\\ 0 & E-p \end{pmatrix}pμ​σˉμ=(E+p0​0E−p​)

and E=pE=pE=p,(2E000)(ab)=0\begin{pmatrix} 2E & 0\\ 0 & 0 \end{pmatrix} \begin{pmatrix} a\\ b \end{pmatrix} =0(2E0​00​)(ab​)=0

This givesa=0a=0a=0

soψL=(01)\boxed{ \psi_L = \begin{pmatrix} 0\\ 1 \end{pmatrix} }ψL​=(01​)​

This is spin-down along the direction of motion.

So a left-handed massless Weyl spinor has negative helicity:h=12\boxed{ h=-\frac12}h=−21​​


4. Massive Dirac case: left and right are coupled

The chiral Dirac equations arepμσμψR=mψLp_\mu\sigma^\mu\psi_R=m\psi_Lpμ​σμψR​=mψL​ pμσˉμψL=mψRp_\mu\bar{\sigma}^\mu\psi_L=m\psi_Rpμ​σˉμψL​=mψR​

Again take motion along zzz:pμσμ=(Ep00E+p)p_\mu\sigma^\mu = \begin{pmatrix} E-p&0\\ 0&E+p \end{pmatrix}pμ​σμ=(E−p0​0E+p​) pμσˉμ=(E+p00Ep)p_\mu\bar{\sigma}^\mu = \begin{pmatrix} E+p&0\\ 0&E-p \end{pmatrix}pμ​σˉμ=(E+p0​0E−p​)

Suppose spin-up, so useψR=(A0),ψL=(B0)\psi_R= \begin{pmatrix} A\\ 0 \end{pmatrix}, \qquad \psi_L= \begin{pmatrix} B\\ 0 \end{pmatrix}ψR​=(A0​),ψL​=(B0​)

Then the first equation gives(Ep)A=mB(E-p)A=mB(E−p)A=mB

The second gives(E+p)B=mA(E+p)B=mA(E+p)B=mA

From the second,B=mE+pAB=\frac{m}{E+p}AB=E+pm​A

UsingE2p2=m2E^2-p^2=m^2E2−p2=m2

we also havemE+p=Epm\frac{m}{E+p} = \frac{E-p}{m}E+pm​=mE−p​

SoψL=mE+pψR\boxed{ \psi_L= \frac{m}{E+p}\psi_R }ψL​=E+pm​ψR​​

For very high energy,EmE\gg mE≫m

somE+pm2E1\frac{m}{E+p}\approx \frac{m}{2E}\ll 1E+pm​≈2Em​≪1

Therefore a high-energy spin-up massive fermion is mostly right-handed, with a small left-handed component.

That is why chirality and helicity become nearly the same at high energy.


Does This Mean QFT Is Linear Like QM?

Partly yes, but mostly no.

Free QFT is linear

The free Klein–Gordon equation is linear:(+m2)ϕ=0(\Box+m^2)\phi=0(□+m2)ϕ=0

The free Dirac equation is linear:(iγμμm)ψ=0(i\gamma^\mu\partial_\mu-m)\psi=0(iγμ∂μ​−m)ψ=0

The free Weyl equation is linear:iσμμψR=0i\sigma^\mu\partial_\mu\psi_R=0iσμ∂μ​ψR​=0

So for free particles, QFT resembles ordinary quantum mechanics: superpositions work cleanly.


But interacting QFT is generally nonlinear

Once interactions are included, the equations are no longer simple linear wave equations.

Example scalar interaction:L=12(ϕ)212m2ϕ2λ4!ϕ4\mathcal L = \frac12(\partial\phi)^2 – \frac12m^2\phi^2 – \frac{\lambda}{4!}\phi^4L=21​(∂ϕ)2−21​m2ϕ2−4!λ​ϕ4

The equation of motion becomes(+m2)ϕ+λ3!ϕ3=0(\Box+m^2)\phi + \frac{\lambda}{3!}\phi^3 =0(□+m2)ϕ+3!λ​ϕ3=0

That ϕ3\phi^3ϕ3 term makes it nonlinear.


QED is also interacting

For the electron field interacting with electromagnetism:(iγμDμm)ψ=0(i\gamma^\mu D_\mu-m)\psi=0(iγμDμ​−m)ψ=0

whereDμ=μ+ieAμD_\mu=\partial_\mu+ieA_\muDμ​=∂μ​+ieAμ​

So the electron field couples to the photon field.

The Maxwell equation also gets a source term:μFμν=eψˉγνψ\partial_\mu F^{\mu\nu}=e\bar{\psi}\gamma^\nu\psi∂μ​Fμν=eψˉ​γνψ

That source contains products of fields.

So the full coupled theory is nonlinear.


The clean answer

Quantum states still evolve linearly in Hilbert space.\boxed{ \text{Quantum states still evolve linearly in Hilbert space.} }Quantum states still evolve linearly in Hilbert space.​

But:the field dynamics of interacting QFT is not linear in the fields.\boxed{ \text{the field dynamics of interacting QFT is not linear in the fields.} }the field dynamics of interacting QFT is not linear in the fields.​

So QFT keeps the linear superposition principle of quantum mechanics, but interactions make the field equations and scattering structure much richer.