Suppose cp is a C1 function on R such that cp(x)+a and cp’(x)~b as xjoo. Prove or give a counterexample: b must be zero.
To address the question, we need to clarify the assumptions and notation:
- φ(x)\varphi(x)φ(x) is a C1C^1C1 function on R\mathbb{R}R.
- As x→∞x \to \inftyx→∞, φ(x)+a\varphi(x) + aφ(x)+a converges to some limit (presumably, this implies φ(x)→−a\varphi(x) \to -aφ(x)→−a).
- φ′(x)→b\varphi'(x) \to bφ′(x)→b as x→∞x \to \inftyx→∞.
We need to determine whether bbb must be zero.
Analyzing the Conditions
Given:
- φ(x)\varphi(x)φ(x) is a C1C^1C1 function, so φ′(x)\varphi'(x)φ′(x) exists and is continuous.
- φ(x)+a\varphi(x) + aφ(x)+a converges as x→∞x \to \inftyx→∞, which we interpret as φ(x)\varphi(x)φ(x) approaching a constant value, specifically −a-a−a.
- φ′(x)→b\varphi'(x) \to bφ′(x)→b as x→∞x \to \inftyx→∞.
Let’s examine the implications of these statements.
Asymptotic Behavior of φ(x)\varphi(x)φ(x)
If φ(x)+a→L\varphi(x) + a \to Lφ(x)+a→L as x→∞x \to \inftyx→∞ for some constant LLL, then φ(x)→−a+L\varphi(x) \to -a + L φ(x)→−a+L. For simplicity, we can redefine LLL so that φ(x)→L\varphi(x) \to Lφ(x)→L as x→∞x \to \inftyx→∞.
Now, consider the derivative φ′(x)\varphi'(x)φ′(x). If φ(x)\varphi(x)φ(x) approaches a constant LLL, the derivative φ′(x)\varphi'(x)φ′(x) must approach zero. This follows because if φ(x)\varphi(x)φ(x) were not approaching a constant, then φ(x)\varphi(x)φ(x) would not settle at a particular value, violating the assumption of convergence.
Formal Proof
To make this rigorous, we can use the definition of a limit:
- Since φ(x)→L\varphi(x) \to Lφ(x)→L as x→∞x \to \inftyx→∞, for any ϵ>0\epsilon > 0ϵ>0, there exists an M>0M > 0M>0 such that for all x>Mx > Mx>M, ∣φ(x)−L∣<ϵ| \varphi(x) – L | < \epsilon∣φ(x)−L∣<ϵ.
- φ′(x)→b\varphi'(x) \to bφ′(x)→b as x→∞x \to \inftyx→∞ implies for any δ>0\delta > 0δ>0, there exists N>0N > 0N>0 such that for all x>Nx > Nx>N, ∣φ′(x)−b∣<δ| \varphi'(x) – b | < \delta∣φ′(x)−b∣<δ.
Now, if b≠0b \neq 0b=0, then φ′(x)\varphi'(x)φ′(x) is bounded away from zero for large xxx. This means φ(x)\varphi(x)φ(x) would be increasing or decreasing without bound, contradicting the fact that φ(x)\varphi(x)φ(x) approaches the constant LLL.
Therefore, bbb must be zero.
Conclusion
Under the given conditions, φ(x)\varphi(x)φ(x) converging to a constant LLL and φ′(x)\varphi'(x)φ′(x) having a limit as x→∞x \to \inftyx→∞ lead us to conclude that the limit of φ′(x)\varphi'(x)φ′(x) must be zero. Thus, bbb must be zero.
Sorry, comments are closed for this post