The Consistency of the Axiom of Choice and the Generalized Continuum-Hypothesis with the Axioms of Set Theory

Background

• Set Theory and ZFC: The Zermelo-Fraenkel axioms with the Axiom of Choice (ZFC) form the standard framework for modern set theory.
  • The Axiom of Choice (AC) states that for any collection of non-empty sets, there exists a choice function that selects one element from each set.
  • The Generalized Continuum Hypothesis (GCH) postulates that for any infinite cardinal κ, 2^κ = κ+ (the next cardinal).
• Hilbert’s Program: David Hilbert asked about the consistency of mathematics, including AC and GCH within ZFC.
• Motivation for Gödel’s Work: To show that AC and GCH are consistent with ZFC, assuming ZFC itself is consistent.

Gödel’s Results

• Inner Models and Constructibility: Gödel introduced the constructible universe L, a class of sets built in a step-by-step, definable manner.
• Axiom of Choice (AC): Gödel showed that AC holds within L.
• Generalized Continuum Hypothesis (GCH): Gödel proved that 2^κ = κ+ for all infinite cardinals κ in L.
• Consistency Proof: Gödel concluded that if ZFC is consistent, then ZFC + AC + GCH is also consistent.

Methodology

• The Constructible Universe: Gödel defined L as a hierarchy indexed by ordinals:
  • L0 contains all hereditarily finite sets.
  • Lα+1 includes subsets of Lα that are definable from parameters.
  • Lλ for limit ordinals λ is the union of all Lα for α < λ.
• Relative Consistency: Gödel showed that if ZFC is consistent, then so is ZFC + AC + GCH.

Impact and Subsequent Developments

• Completeness vs. Independence: Paul Cohen (1963) showed that AC and GCH are independent of ZFC, meaning they can neither be proved nor disproved from ZFC.
• Foundation of Modern Set Theory: Gödel’s methods laid the groundwork for later developments in set theory.
• Philosophical Implications: Gödel’s work highlighted the limitations of formal systems and the existence of different “universes” of set theory.

Conclusion

Gödel’s 1940 paper demonstrated the relative consistency of the Axiom of Choice and the Generalized Continuum Hypothesis with the axioms of set theory. This foundational work had a profound impact on set theory and mathematical logic, influencing both its philosophy and technical practice.

The post Godel’s Consistency of Axiom of Choice Paper appeared first on Time Travel, Quantum Entanglement and Quantum Computing.

What Are Finite Abelian Groups?

A finite abelian group is a group with the following properties:

• Closure: For any , .
• Associativity: For all , .
• Identity: There exists an identity element such that for all .
• Inverses: For every , there exists an such that .
• Commutativity: For all , .

If the group has a finite number of elements, it is called finite.

Structure of Finite Abelian Groups

The Fundamental Theorem of Finite Abelian Groups states that every finite abelian group can be expressed as a direct product of cyclic groups of prime power order:

where are integers greater than 1.

Examples of Finite Abelian Groups

• Cyclic Groups:
  • , the integers modulo under addition.
  • Example: with addition modulo 6.
• Direct Product of Cyclic Groups:
  • , the Klein four-group:

       

  • :

       

• Additive Group of Finite Fields: The set of elements of a finite field under addition forms a finite abelian group.
• Root of Unity Groups: The -th roots of unity under multiplication.

Applications to Quantum Physics

1. Quantum Mechanics and Symmetry

• Discrete Symmetries: Finite abelian groups often describe symmetries of quantum systems, such as the Klein four-group , which can describe symmetries in molecular structures or lattice vibrations.
• Conservation Laws: The symmetries of a system are associated with conserved quantities, often modeled using finite abelian groups.

2. Quantum Computing

• Quantum Gates: The structure of finite abelian groups is crucial in algorithms like Shor’s algorithm, where periodicity plays a significant role.
• Quantum Error Correction: Stabilizer codes, used in error correction, leverage abelian group structures to define subspaces.

3. Topological Phases of Matter

• Abelian Anyons: Quasiparticles in topological systems exhibit abelian statistics, modeled by finite abelian groups.
• Fractional Quantum Hall Effect: Finite abelian groups describe the ground state degeneracies and quasiparticle statistics of these systems.

4. Crystallography and Solid-State Physics

• Lattice Symmetries: Finite abelian groups classify vibrational modes (phonons) and electronic band structures.
• Bloch’s Theorem: Translational symmetry, often modeled as , leads to quantized energy levels in the form of Bloch waves.

Conclusion

Finite abelian groups provide the mathematical foundation for understanding symmetry, periodicity, and conserved quantities in quantum systems. They play a crucial role in quantum computing, error correction, and the study of topological phases of matter, highlighting the deep connections between algebra and the physical world.

The post Finite Abelian Groups and Applications to Quantum Physics appeared first on Time Travel, Quantum Entanglement and Quantum Computing.

Examples of Finite Galois Groups

1. The Cyclic Group \( C_n \)

Example: Consider the extension
\( \mathbb{Q}(\alpha_n)/\mathbb{Q} \), where \( \alpha_n \) is a primitive \( n \)-th root of unity.
The Galois group is
\( \text{Gal}(\mathbb{Q}(\alpha_n)/\mathbb{Q}) \cong (\mathbb{Z}/n\mathbb{Z})^\times \),
which is cyclic for prime \( n \).

Order: \( \phi(n) \), where \( \phi \) is Euler’s totient function.

2. The Symmetric Group \( S_n \)

Example: The splitting field of a generic polynomial of degree \( n \) over
\( \mathbb{Q} \) typically has
\( \text{Gal}(E/\mathbb{Q}) \cong S_n \), the symmetric group on \( n \) elements.

Order: \( n! \).

3. The Dihedral Group \( D_n \)

Example: The Galois group of a quadratic extension of a quadratic field (e.g.,
\( \text{Gal}(\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{a}, \sqrt{b})/\mathbb{Q}) \))
can be isomorphic to the dihedral group \( D_4 \), representing the symmetries of a square.

Order: \( 2n \).

4. Alternating Group \( A_n \)

Example: For certain polynomials, the Galois group can be \( A_n \), the alternating group, a subgroup of \( S_n \) consisting of even permutations. For instance, \( x^5 – 5x + 12 \) has \( \text{Gal} \) isomorphic to \( A_5 \).

Order: \( n!/2 \).

5. Klein Four Group \( V_4 \)

Example: The splitting field of \( x^4 – 4x^2 + 2 \) over
\( \mathbb{Q} \) has
\( \text{Gal}(E/\mathbb{Q}) \cong V_4 \), the Klein four group.

Order: 4.

Applications in Quantum Mechanics

1. Symmetry and Conservation Laws

Quantum systems often exhibit symmetries that are described by finite groups (e.g., cyclic or dihedral groups for rotational symmetries in molecules or crystals).

Example: In molecular quantum mechanics, the electronic structure of a molecule with a cyclic or dihedral symmetry (e.g., a water molecule) can be analyzed using group theory. The Galois group describes the splitting of energy levels due to symmetry breaking.

2. Algebraic Solutions to Quantum Problems

Galois theory provides insight into the solvability of polynomial equations that arise in quantum systems, such as the secular determinant for eigenvalues of Hamiltonians.

Example: The energy levels of certain quantum systems correspond to roots of polynomials whose Galois groups determine their solvability by radicals. For example, a quartic potential’s energy spectrum involves solving degree-4 polynomials.

3. Quantum Field Theory (QFT)

Finite Galois groups appear in the study of symmetry breaking in quantum field theory. For instance, in spontaneous symmetry breaking, the residual symmetries can be associated with Galois groups.

Example: The Klein four group \( V_4 \) describes certain discrete symmetries in particle physics models.

4. Topological Quantum Computation

Finite groups, including Galois groups, help describe topological phases of matter. Quantum states associated with field extensions and Galois groups provide a mathematical foundation for encoding quantum information.

Example: Galois symmetries are connected to the monodromy groups of braid representations in topological quantum computers.

5. Degeneracies and Level Crossing

The behavior of eigenvalues of quantum systems, especially degeneracies and level crossings, is influenced by the symmetries of the system, often tied to Galois groups.

Example: The structure of the splitting field of eigenvalues can give insight into how symmetry constraints affect degeneracies.

The post Galois Groups and Applications to Quantum Mechanics appeared first on Time Travel, Quantum Entanglement and Quantum Computing.

Wave Continuity in Matrix Formulation of Quantum Mechanics?

In the matrix formulation of quantum mechanics (developed primarily by Heisenberg), the concept that replaces
analytic continuity of the wave function is the algebraic structure and consistency of operators in Hilbert space.
While the Schrödinger formulation relies on the analytic properties of the wave function, the matrix formulation emphasizes the following key features:

• Hermiticity and Self-Adjoint Operators:Physical observables in the matrix formulation are represented by Hermitian operators (self-adjoint matrices), ensuring real eigenvalues
  corresponding to measurable quantities. The algebra of these operators must be consistent and preserve the physical requirements of the theory.
• Commutation Relations:The fundamental relationships between observables, such as the canonical commutation relations
  [ ˆx, ˆp ] = iℏ, play a central role. These relations ensure the internal consistency of quantum mechanics
  and replace the need for analytic continuity of the wave function.
• Unitary Evolution:In the Schrödinger picture, the time evolution of the wave function must be continuous and differentiable, governed by the Schrödinger equation.
  In the matrix formulation, the time evolution is encoded in the unitary evolution of state vectors or density matrices in Hilbert space, satisfying
  ˆU(t)ˆU†(t) = ˆI.
• Spectrum and Eigenstates:The spectrum of the operators (eigenvalues) and their corresponding eigenstates provide the quantum mechanical predictions. These eigenvalues and
  eigenvectors are well-defined algebraically, independent of the notion of analytic continuity.
• Matrix Element Consistency:The elements of matrices in this formulation encode transition amplitudes between quantum states, and their consistency is guaranteed by the
  mathematical framework of linear algebra and Hilbert space theory.

In summary, while analytic continuity ensures the smoothness and well-defined behavior of the wave function in the Schrödinger picture, the matrix formulation
relies on the consistency of operator algebra, the structure of commutation relations, and the properties of Hilbert space. This shift reflects the abstract
algebraic nature of the matrix formulation, which avoids the explicit reliance on continuous functions.

“`

The post What replaces wave analytic continuity in the Matrix Mechanics picture? appeared first on Time Travel, Quantum Entanglement and Quantum Computing.

The wave picture and the matrix

All the Useful Math

Analytic continuation of wave funtions, analytic functions – all these conceptes developed over hundreds of years, are useful in the wave function picture.  In fact, without these, appropriate  energy levels (or any other measurable results) cannot be derived.

So what happens to all these constructs when we abandon this wave picture (in favor of the matrix picture)?

The Stark Contrast

These two  pictures could not be more different – mathematically or physically speaking.

One supports – or at least ALLOWS, determinism in physical laws – whereas the other picture completely eliminates it.

So – What’s the research topic?

Are there experiments that support ONLY one of these two pictures? i.e. the results will be different based on which method was used to derive the results?

The post Experimental Quantum Mechanics – wave versus matrix mechanics appeared first on Time Travel, Quantum Entanglement and Quantum Computing.

The Poincaré Recurrence Theorem is a foundational result in dynamical systems and ergodic theory, which asserts that a system in a finite phase space will, after sufficient time, return arbitrarily close to its initial state. Mathematical derivation and proof:

Statement of the Theorem

Let (X, 𝕌, μ, T) be a measure-preserving dynamical system where:

• X is the phase space.
• 𝕌 is a σ-algebra of measurable sets.
• μ is a finite measure with μ(X) < ∞.
• T: X → X is a measurable, measure-preserving transformation (μ(T^-1(A)) = μ(A) for all A ∈ 𝕌).

Then for any measurable set A ⊆ X with μ(A) > 0, almost every point in A will return to A infinitely often under iteration of T. That is, for almost every x ∈ A, there exist infinitely many n ∈ ℕ such that Tⁿ(x) ∈ A.

Proof

1. Setup and Definitions

Define the return time set for a point x ∈ A:

R_A(x) = { n ∈ ℕ : Tⁿ(x) ∈ A }.

The goal is to show that for almost every x ∈ A, R_A(x) is infinite.

2. Measure Preservation

Since T is measure-preserving, the measure of T^-n(A) is the same as the measure of A:

μ(T^-n(A)) = μ(A),   ∀ n ≥ 1.

3. Construct the Escape Set

Define the escape set E as the set of points in A that leave A and never return:

E = { x ∈ A : Tⁿ(x) ∉ A,   ∀ n ≥ 1 }.

We aim to show μ(E) = 0.

4. Decompose A

The set A can be decomposed as:

A = ⋃_n=0^∞ (T^-n(A) − ⋃_k=0^n-1 T^-k(A)) ∪ E.

This decomposition divides A into disjoint subsets of points that first return to A at specific times n, along with the escape set E.

5. Measure of the Escape Set

The union of pre-images ⋃_n=0^∞ T^-n(A) is an invariant set (since T is measure-preserving), and thus its measure cannot exceed μ(X). Because μ(A) > 0 and measure-preservation ensures recurrence in finite measure spaces, any measure assigned to E would contradict this preservation unless μ(E) = 0.

6. Almost Sure Recurrence

For any point x ∈ A outside of E, R_A(x) must be infinite since the measure-preserving dynamics of T ensure that the measure “flows” back into A repeatedly over time.

Conclusion

Thus, for almost every x ∈ A, the point x returns to A infinitely often, completing the derivation of the Poincaré Recurrence Theorem.

“`

You can save this code to an `.html` file and open it in any web browser to view the formatted derivation. Let me know if you’d like any adjustments!

The post Poincare Recurrence Theorem – Mathematical appeared first on Time Travel, Quantum Entanglement and Quantum Computing.

He claimed that there are only observable quantities – and these quantities can be measured. Nothing more, nothing less. One cannot talk about the ‘path’ in between measurements – because there is no such thing.

The post Trajectories don’t exist appeared first on Time Travel, Quantum Entanglement and Quantum Computing.

Field Equation for a Free Scalar Field

The action for a free scalar field φ(x) in four-dimensional spacetime is given by:

S = ∫ d⁴x [ (1/2) ∂^μφ ∂_μφ – (1/2) m²φ² ],

where:

• φ(x) is the scalar field.
• m is the mass of the scalar field.
• ∂^μ = η^μν ∂_ν, with the metric signature (+, -, -, -).

The Euler-Lagrange equation for this action yields the Klein-Gordon equation:

□φ + m²φ = 0,

where:

□ = ∂^μ∂_μ = ∂²/∂t² – ∇²

is the d’Alembertian operator.

Matrix Mechanics Representation

1. Discretizing Spacetime

Spacetime is replaced by a finite lattice with points x_i (e.g., i = 1, 2, …, N). The field φ(x) is represented as a vector:

φ(x) → 𝐯 = [ φ(x₁), φ(x₂), …, φ(x_N) ]^T.

2. Representing Derivatives with Matrices

The derivative operators ∂^μ and □ are approximated using finite difference methods:

• The spatial Laplacian ∇² is represented by a matrix 𝐋.
• The time derivative ∂²/∂t² is represented by another matrix.

The d’Alembertian □ becomes:

□φ → 𝐃𝐯,

where 𝐃 is the discretized representation of □.

3. Equation in Matrix Form

The Klein-Gordon equation in matrix form is:

𝐃𝐯 + m²𝐯 = 0.

4. Solution Using Eigenmodes

The solution can be found by diagonalizing the operator 𝐃 + m²𝐈. Let 𝐔 be the matrix of eigenvectors and Λ the diagonal matrix of eigenvalues:

𝐃 = 𝐔Λ𝐔^†.

The solution to the matrix equation is then:

𝐯(t) = 𝐔 e^-i√Λt𝐜,

where 𝐜 is determined by the initial conditions.

Physical Interpretation

• Eigenmodes: Each eigenmode corresponds to a plane wave solution e^{-i(E t – k⋅x)} with the dispersion relation E² = k² + m².
• Superposition: The field evolution is a superposition of eigenmodes governed by the eigenvalues and eigenvectors of 𝐃.

Applications

This matrix mechanics representation is commonly used in numerical simulations of quantum field theories and lattice field theory computations.

“`

The post Free Scalar Field Equation – Solved using matrix mechanics appeared first on Time Travel, Quantum Entanglement and Quantum Computing.

Using Conformal Mapping in Block Encryption

Conformal mappings preserve angles and local structures, making them conceptually relevant to cryptography. Here’s how the conformal mapping described earlier can be adapted for block encryption.

1. Encoding Data as Complex Numbers

Block encryption works on binary data. Encode data as complex numbers by representing each block (e.g., 128 bits) as a pair of real numbers to form a complex number
z = x + iy.

2. Applying the Conformal Map

Use the conformal mapping:

f(z) = [(exp(πi·log(z) / 3) – i) / (exp(πi·log(z) / 3) + i)].

This nonlinear, invertible transformation ensures diffusion, as small changes in z produce significant changes in f(z).

3. Combining with a Key

Introduce a secret key to enhance security by modifying parameters of the conformal map. For example:

• Use a key-dependent angle θ_k instead of π/3.
• Modify the logarithmic base or scaling factor with the key:
  f_k(z) = [(exp(θ_k·i·log_k(z) / 3) – i) / (exp(θ_k·i·log_k(z) / 3) + i)].

4. Normalization and Data Output

The output of fk(z) is a complex number in the unit disk. Rescale and encode it back to binary format for subsequent encryption rounds or final ciphertext.

5. Inverse Mapping for Decryption

Decryption involves applying the inverse map:

z = f_k^-1(w),

where w is the ciphertext.

Advantages of Using Conformal Mappings in Cryptography

• Nonlinearity: Introduces strong nonlinearity, enhancing resistance to cryptanalysis.
• Invertibility: Conformal mappings are inherently invertible, meeting encryption requirements.
• Diffusion: Spreads small input changes across the entire block.

Challenges

• Numerical Precision: High precision is needed for operations like logarithms and exponentials.
• Efficiency: The transformations may introduce computational overhead.
• Key Sensitivity: Ensuring key-modified transformations maintain cryptographic properties.

By integrating conformal maps like f(z) into cryptographic algorithms, novel encryption schemes can be developed, especially in scenarios requiring strong geometric transformations.

The post Applying a conformal map to accomplish Block Encryption appeared first on Time Travel, Quantum Entanglement and Quantum Computing.

We aim to construct a conformal equivalence f between the “angle”
A = { z ∈ ℂ | z ≠ 0, 0 < arg(z) < π/3 }
and the unit disk
𝔻 = { w ∈ ℂ | |w| < 1 }.

1. Map the angle to a horizontal strip

Use the logarithm map:

z → w₁ = log(z) = ln|z| + i·arg(z),

where z ∈ A. Under this map:

• The boundary ray arg(z) = 0 maps to the real axis (Im(w₁) = 0).
• The boundary ray arg(z) = π/3 maps to the line Im(w₁) = π/3.
• The region A maps to the horizontal strip
  S = { w₁ ∈ ℂ | 0 < Im(w₁) < π/3 }.

2. Map the strip to the upper half-plane

The exponential stretching map:

w₁ → w₂ = exp(πi·w₁ / 3)

transforms the strip S to the upper half-plane
H = { w₂ ∈ ℂ | Im(w₂) > 0 }.

3. Map the upper half-plane to the unit disk

The Möbius transformation:

w₂ → w₃ = (w₂ – i) / (w₂ + i)

is a conformal equivalence between the upper half-plane H and the unit disk 𝔻.

4. Combine the maps

The full conformal map f: A → 𝔻 is the composition:

f(z) = [(exp(πi·log(z) / 3) – i) / (exp(πi·log(z) / 3) + i)].

5. Simplified expression

Expanding the steps, the final form of f(z) is:

f(z) = [(exp(πi(ln|z| + i·arg(z)) / 3) – i) / (exp(πi(ln|z| + i·arg(z)) / 3) + i)].

“`

The post Construct a conformal equivalence f between the “angle” {z ∈ C | z 6= 0, 0 < arg(z) < π/3} and the unit disk D ⊂ C appeared first on Time Travel, Quantum Entanglement and Quantum Computing.