General Relativity and Cosmology Archives - Time Travel, Quantum Entanglement and Quantum Computing https://stationarystates.com/category/general-relativity-and-cosmology/ Not only is the Universe stranger than we think, it is stranger than we can think...Hiesenberg Tue, 19 Nov 2024 18:11:44 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.7.1 Gödel’s Solution to Einstein’s Field Equations https://stationarystates.com/general-relativity-and-cosmology/godels-solution-to-einsteins-field-equations/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=godels-solution-to-einsteins-field-equations Tue, 19 Nov 2024 18:11:44 +0000 https://stationarystates.com/?p=663 Gödel’s Solution to Einstein’s Field Equations Kurt Gödel’s solution to Einstein’s field equations is a fascinating example of how general relativity (GR) can predict exotic spacetime geometries. Gödel introduced a […]

The post Gödel’s Solution to Einstein’s Field Equations appeared first on Time Travel, Quantum Entanglement and Quantum Computing.

]]>
Gödel’s Solution to Einstein’s Field Equations

Kurt Gödel’s solution to Einstein’s field equations is a fascinating example of how general relativity (GR) can predict exotic spacetime geometries. Gödel introduced a rotating universe solution, which demonstrated the theoretical possibility of closed timelike curves (CTCs), implying time travel within the framework of GR. Below is a step-by-step derivation and explanation of Gödel’s solution.

1. Einstein’s Field Equations

Einstein’s field equations (EFE) relate the geometry of spacetime to the distribution of matter and energy:

Gμν + Λ gμν = (8πG/c4) Tμν,

where:

  • Gμν = Rμν - (1/2) R gμν: Einstein tensor
  • Rμν: Ricci curvature tensor
  • R: Ricci scalar
  • gμν: Metric tensor
  • Λ: Cosmological constant
  • Tμν: Stress-energy tensor

2. Gödel’s Metric

Gödel proposed a specific spacetime metric with cylindrical symmetry, written in polar coordinates (t, r, φ, z) as:

ds² = a² [ - (dt + e^x dφ)² + dx² + (1/2) e²ˣ dφ² + dz² ],

where:

  • a: Scaling constant related to the rotation and energy density of the universe
  • e^x: Exponential dependence on the radial direction

3. Stress-Energy Tensor for a Perfect Fluid

Gödel assumed a perfect fluid as the source of the gravitational field:

Tμν = (ρ + p) uμ uν + p gμν,

where:

  • ρ: Energy density
  • p: Pressure
  • uμ: 4-velocity of the fluid

In Gödel’s solution, the pressure p is zero, leaving only ρ as the relevant parameter.

4. Solving the Field Equations

Gödel substituted his metric into the Einstein tensor Gμν and matched it to the stress-energy tensor Tμν along with the cosmological term:

Gμν + Λ gμν = 8πG ρ uμ uν.

Key steps include:

  • Compute the Christoffel symbols from the metric gμν.
  • Derive the Ricci tensor Rμν and scalar R.
  • Calculate Gμν and balance it with the stress-energy tensor and Λ.

5. Properties of Gödel’s Universe

  • Rotational Motion: The universe exhibits a global rotation.
  • Closed Timelike Curves (CTCs): Paths through spacetime loop back on themselves, implying time travel.
  • Homogeneity and Isotropy: The universe is homogeneous but not isotropic due to rotation.

6. Physical Interpretation

Gödel’s solution, while mathematically valid, represents a highly idealized universe:

  • It challenges our understanding of time and causality in GR.
  • The presence of CTCs implies that GR permits, under certain conditions, the theoretical possibility of time travel.
  • The cosmological constant Λ balances the stress-energy tensor and the geometry.

Summary

Gödel solved EFE by choosing a rotating metric, a perfect fluid stress-energy tensor, and a specific relationship between Λ and ρ. The solution describes a rotating, homogeneous universe with exotic properties like CTCs, illustrating the richness of GR and its implications for spacetime.

 

The post Gödel’s Solution to Einstein’s Field Equations appeared first on Time Travel, Quantum Entanglement and Quantum Computing.

]]>
Richard Gott’s Three Universes at the Big Bang https://stationarystates.com/general-relativity-and-cosmology/big-bang-singularity/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=big-bang-singularity Tue, 05 Nov 2024 19:01:47 +0000 https://stationarystates.com/?p=657 Gott’s Theory on the Big Bang Singularity J. Richard Gott, a Princeton physicist, proposed an intriguing theory concerning the Big Bang Singularity. His idea explores what happens if we consider […]

The post Richard Gott’s Three Universes at the Big Bang appeared first on Time Travel, Quantum Entanglement and Quantum Computing.

]]>
Gott’s Theory on the Big Bang Singularity

J. Richard Gott, a Princeton physicist, proposed an intriguing theory concerning the Big Bang Singularity. His idea explores what happens if we consider quantum effects alongside general relativity, suggesting that the traditional “singularity” at the origin of the Big Bang may not have existed in the way we commonly think.

Gott’s theory hinges on the idea that when quantum mechanics is taken into account, the infinite density and curvature of the singularity (the point at which the universe is thought to have originated) vanish. Instead of a single, infinitely small and dense point, Gott proposed that the Big Bang may have created three equally probable, interrelated universes. In his view, these three universes emerge not as distinct entities but as a tripartite structure, each influencing and mirroring the others in a fundamental symmetry.

1. Quantum Mechanics and General Relativity Combined

In classical general relativity, the Big Bang singularity is an unavoidable consequence of gravity collapsing spacetime into an infinitely dense point. However, quantum mechanics doesn’t play well with such infinities. Gott suggested that if we bring quantum effects into the equation, the sharp boundary of the singularity dissolves, giving rise to a smoother beginning.

2. Three Universes from the Same Event

According to Gott, the Big Bang, influenced by quantum effects, could have created three distinct universes. Each of these universes would be probabilistically equivalent, meaning none is fundamentally different or superior to the others. This “triplet” arrangement suggests that rather than one universe branching into many, three universes were born simultaneously, each with a shared origin and characteristics but developing independently.

3. Implications for Cosmology

If Gott’s theory holds, it would imply a departure from the traditional single-universe model and the multiverse models that suggest an unbounded number of universes. Instead, we would have a tripartite universe structure, providing a simpler framework for understanding cosmic evolution and symmetry.

In essence, Gott’s theory is part of the broader effort to reconcile the discrepancies between quantum mechanics and general relativity at the universe’s origin, challenging the notion of a singularity and offering a possible triplet-universe alternative to our current cosmological models. This idea also opens fascinating questions about how these “sibling” universes might interact or whether they could even be observed.

 

The post Richard Gott’s Three Universes at the Big Bang appeared first on Time Travel, Quantum Entanglement and Quantum Computing.

]]>
Particle Trajectory in Curved Space Using Jacobi Equation https://stationarystates.com/general-relativity-and-cosmology/particle-trajectory-in-curved-space-using-jacobi-equation/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=particle-trajectory-in-curved-space-using-jacobi-equation Wed, 07 Aug 2024 03:53:48 +0000 https://stationarystates.com/?p=570 To derive the trajectory of a particle in a curved gravitational field using the Hamilton-Jacobi equation, we will follow these steps: 1. **Hamilton-Jacobi Equation**:     Here, is the Hamilton’s […]

The post Particle Trajectory in Curved Space Using Jacobi Equation appeared first on Time Travel, Quantum Entanglement and Quantum Computing.

]]>
To derive the trajectory of a particle in a curved gravitational field using the Hamilton-Jacobi equation, we will follow these steps:

1. **Hamilton-Jacobi Equation**:

    \[ H\left( q_i, \frac{\partial S}{\partial q_i}, t \right) + \frac{\partial S}{\partial t} = 0 \]

Here, S is the Hamilton’s principal function, H is the Hamiltonian of the system, and q_i are the generalized coordinates.

2. **Hamiltonian for a Particle in a Curved Gravitational Field**:
The Hamiltonian in a gravitational field described by a metric g_{\mu\nu} is:

    \[ H = \frac{1}{2} g^{\mu\nu} p_\mu p_\nu \]

where p_\mu are the conjugate momenta.

3. **Hamilton’s Principal Function**:
Assume a solution for S of the form:

    \[ S = W(q_i) - E t \]

where W(q_i) is a function of the coordinates and E is the energy of the particle.

4. **Substitute into the Hamilton-Jacobi Equation**:
Substituting S into the Hamilton-Jacobi equation gives:

    \[ H\left( q_i, \frac{\partial W}{\partial q_i} \right) - E = 0 \]

    \[ \frac{1}{2} g^{\mu\nu} \frac{\partial W}{\partial q_\mu} \frac{\partial W}{\partial q_\nu} = E \]

5. **Solve for W**:
This equation is a partial differential equation for W(q_i). Solving this will give us the function W.

6. **Obtain Equations of Motion**:
Once W is known, the trajectory can be found using:

    \[ p_\mu = \frac{\partial W}{\partial q_\mu} \]

The equations of motion are given by Hamilton’s equations:

    \[ \frac{dq_\mu}{dt} = \frac{\partial H}{\partial p_\mu} = g^{\mu\nu} p_\nu \]

    \[ \frac{dp_\mu}{dt} = -\frac{\partial H}{\partial q_\mu} \]

### Detailed Steps:

1. **Start with the Hamilton-Jacobi Equation**:

    \[ \frac{1}{2} g^{\mu\nu} \frac{\partial S}{\partial q_\mu} \frac{\partial S}{\partial q_\nu} + \frac{\partial S}{\partial t} = 0 \]

2. **Assume S = W(q_i) - E t**:

    \[ \frac{1}{2} g^{\mu\nu} \frac{\partial W}{\partial q_\mu} \frac{\partial W}{\partial q_\nu} - E = 0 \]

This simplifies to:

    \[ \frac{1}{2} g^{\mu\nu} \frac{\partial W}{\partial q_\mu} \frac{\partial W}{\partial q_\nu} = E \]

3. **Solve for W(q_i)**:
Solve this PDE for W. In many cases, this requires choosing appropriate coordinates and exploiting symmetries in the metric g_{\mu\nu}.

4. **Calculate p_\mu**:

    \[ p_\mu = \frac{\partial W}{\partial q_\mu} \]

5. **Hamilton’s Equations**:
Use p_\mu to find the equations of motion:

    \[ \frac{dq_\mu}{dt} = \frac{\partial H}{\partial p_\mu} = g^{\mu\nu} p_\nu \]

6. **Integrate the Equations of Motion**:
These differential equations describe the trajectory q_\mu(t). Integrating them provides the trajectory of the particle in the curved gravitational field.

### Example: Schwarzschild Metric
For a particle in a Schwarzschild gravitational field, the metric is:

    \[ ds^2 = -\left(1 - \frac{2GM}{r}\right) dt^2 + \left(1 - \frac{2GM}{r}\right)^{-1} dr^2 + r^2 d\theta^2 + r^2 \sin^2\theta d\phi^2 \]

1. **Hamiltonian**:

    \[ H = \frac{1}{2} \left[ -\left(1 - \frac{2GM}{r}\right)^{-1} p_t^2 + \left(1 - \frac{2GM}{r}\right) p_r^2 + \frac{1}{r^2} p_\theta^2 + \frac{1}{r^2 \sin^2 \theta} p_\phi^2 \right] \]

2. **Hamilton-Jacobi Equation**:
Substitute S = -Et + W(r, \theta, \phi):

    \[ \frac{1}{2} \left[ -\left(1 - \frac{2GM}{r}\right)^{-1} E^2 + \left(1 - \frac{2GM}{r}\right) \left( \frac{\partial W}{\partial r} \right)^2 + \frac{1}{r^2} \left( \frac{\partial W}{\partial \theta} \right)^2 + \frac{1}{r^2 \sin^2 \theta} \left( \frac{\partial W}{\partial \phi} \right)^2 \right] = 0 \]

3. **Separation of Variables**:
Assume W = W_r(r) + W_\theta(\theta) + W_\phi(\phi). Separate variables and solve for each part.

4. **Find p_\mu** and **Integrate**:

    \[ p_t = -E, \quad p_r = \frac{\partial W_r}{\partial r}, \quad p_\theta = \frac{\partial W_\theta}{\partial \theta}, \quad p_\phi = \frac{\partial W_\phi}{\partial \phi} \]

    \[ \frac{dr}{dt} = \left(1 - \frac{2GM}{r}\right) p_r, \quad \frac{d\theta}{dt} = \frac{p_\theta}{r^2}, \quad \frac{d\phi}{dt} = \frac{p_\phi}{r^2 \sin^2 \theta} \]

Integrate these equations to find the trajectory r(t), \theta(t), \phi(t).

This outlines the steps for deriving the trajectory of a particle in a curved gravitational field using the Hamilton-Jacobi equation. Each step involves setting up the problem, solving the Hamilton-Jacobi PDE, and then using the solutions to find the equations of motion.

The post Particle Trajectory in Curved Space Using Jacobi Equation appeared first on Time Travel, Quantum Entanglement and Quantum Computing.

]]>
Curved Space does not need to be embedded in a flat space time https://stationarystates.com/general-relativity-and-cosmology/curved-space-does-not-need-to-be-embedded-in-a-flat-space-time/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=curved-space-does-not-need-to-be-embedded-in-a-flat-space-time Mon, 05 Aug 2024 21:36:38 +0000 https://stationarystates.com/?p=566 One of the conceptual problems we humans had was visualizing curved Space as something that exists in the foreground of a FLAT background. Riemann showed that there does not need […]

The post Curved Space does not need to be embedded in a flat space time appeared first on Time Travel, Quantum Entanglement and Quantum Computing.

]]>
One of the conceptual problems we humans had was visualizing curved Space as something that exists in the foreground of a FLAT background.

Riemann showed that there does not need to be this type of embedding. A curved space exists on it’s own – without being embedded in a flat space time.

The post Curved Space does not need to be embedded in a flat space time appeared first on Time Travel, Quantum Entanglement and Quantum Computing.

]]>
Schwarzschild Solution for a Black Hole https://stationarystates.com/general-relativity-and-cosmology/schwarzschild-solution-for-a-black-hole/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=schwarzschild-solution-for-a-black-hole https://stationarystates.com/general-relativity-and-cosmology/schwarzschild-solution-for-a-black-hole/#comments Sat, 06 Jul 2024 20:02:00 +0000 https://stationarystates.com/?p=507 Schwarzschild Solution for a Black Hole 1. Schwarzschild Metric: The Schwarzschild solution is the simplest solution to Einstein’s field equations in general relativity. It describes the spacetime geometry surrounding a […]

The post Schwarzschild Solution for a Black Hole appeared first on Time Travel, Quantum Entanglement and Quantum Computing.

]]>
Schwarzschild Solution for a Black Hole

1. Schwarzschild Metric: The Schwarzschild solution is the simplest solution to Einstein’s field equations in general relativity. It describes the spacetime geometry surrounding a spherical, non-rotating, and uncharged mass such as a static black hole. The Schwarzschild metric in Schwarzschild coordinates (t,r,θ,ϕ)(t, r, \theta, \phi) is given by:

ds2=−(1−2GMc2r)c2dt2+(1−2GMc2r)−1dr2+r2(dθ2+sin⁡2θ dϕ2),ds^2 = -\left(1 – \frac{2GM}{c^2r}\right)c^2 dt^2 + \left(1 – \frac{2GM}{c^2r}\right)^{-1} dr^2 + r^2 (d\theta^2 + \sin^2\theta \, d\phi^2),

where:

  • GG is the gravitational constant,
  • MM is the mass of the black hole,
  • cc is the speed of light,
  • tt is the time coordinate,
  • rr is the radial coordinate,
  • θ\theta and ϕ\phi are the angular coordinates.

2. Event Horizon: The Schwarzschild radius rs=2GMc2r_s = \frac{2GM}{c^2} is the radius of the event horizon of the black hole. At r=rsr = r_s, the metric component gttg_{tt} goes to zero, and grrg_{rr} becomes infinite, indicating the event horizon beyond which no information can escape.

3. Singularities:

  • Coordinate Singularities: At r=rsr = r_s, the metric has a coordinate singularity, which can be removed by changing coordinates (e.g., using Kruskal-Szekeres coordinates).
  • Physical Singularities: At r=0r = 0, there is a true physical singularity where spacetime curvature becomes infinite.

Scalar Wave Equation in a Schwarzschild Background

1. Scalar Wave Equation: The scalar wave equation for a massless scalar field Φ\Phi in a curved spacetime is given by the Klein-Gordon equation:

□Φ=1−g∂μ(−g gμν∂νΦ)=0,\Box \Phi = \frac{1}{\sqrt{-g}} \partial_\mu (\sqrt{-g} \, g^{\mu\nu} \partial_\nu \Phi) = 0,

where □\Box is the d’Alembertian operator in curved spacetime, gg is the determinant of the metric tensor gμνg_{\mu\nu}, and gμνg^{\mu\nu} are the components of the inverse metric tensor.

The post Schwarzschild Solution for a Black Hole appeared first on Time Travel, Quantum Entanglement and Quantum Computing.

]]>
https://stationarystates.com/general-relativity-and-cosmology/schwarzschild-solution-for-a-black-hole/feed/ 1
Scalar Wave Equation in a Schwarzschild Background https://stationarystates.com/cosmology/scalar-wave-equation-in-a-schwarzschild-background/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=scalar-wave-equation-in-a-schwarzschild-background Sat, 06 Jul 2024 20:00:20 +0000 https://stationarystates.com/?p=505 Schwarzschild Solution for a Black Hole Scalar Wave Equation in Schwarzschild Background: For the Schwarzschild metric, the scalar wave equation becomes: (1−2GMc2r)−1∂2Φ∂t2−1r2∂∂r(r2(1−2GMc2r)∂Φ∂r)−1r2sin⁡θ∂∂θ(sin⁡θ∂Φ∂θ)−1r2sin⁡2θ∂2Φ∂ϕ2=0.\left(1 – \frac{2GM}{c^2r}\right)^{-1} \frac{\partial^2 \Phi}{\partial t^2} – \frac{1}{r^2} \frac{\partial}{\partial […]

The post Scalar Wave Equation in a Schwarzschild Background appeared first on Time Travel, Quantum Entanglement and Quantum Computing.

]]>

Schwarzschild Solution for a Black Hole

Scalar Wave Equation in Schwarzschild Background: For the Schwarzschild metric, the scalar wave equation becomes:

(1−2GMc2r)−1∂2Φ∂t2−1r2∂∂r(r2(1−2GMc2r)∂Φ∂r)−1r2sin⁡θ∂∂θ(sin⁡θ∂Φ∂θ)−1r2sin⁡2θ∂2Φ∂ϕ2=0.\left(1 – \frac{2GM}{c^2r}\right)^{-1} \frac{\partial^2 \Phi}{\partial t^2} – \frac{1}{r^2} \frac{\partial}{\partial r} \left( r^2 \left(1 – \frac{2GM}{c^2r}\right) \frac{\partial \Phi}{\partial r} \right) – \frac{1}{r^2 \sin \theta} \frac{\partial}{\partial \theta} \left( \sin \theta \frac{\partial \Phi}{\partial \theta} \right) – \frac{1}{r^2 \sin^2 \theta} \frac{\partial^2 \Phi}{\partial \phi^2} = 0.

3. Separation of Variables: To solve this equation, we often use separation of variables. Let:

Φ(t,r,θ,ϕ)=e−iωtψ(r)rYlm(θ,ϕ),\Phi(t, r, \theta, \phi) = e^{-i\omega t} \frac{\psi(r)}{r} Y_{lm}(\theta, \phi),

where Ylm(θ,ϕ)Y_{lm}(\theta, \phi) are the spherical harmonics and ω\omega is the frequency of the wave.

4. Radial Equation: Substituting this ansatz into the wave equation and simplifying, we obtain the radial equation:

(1−2GMc2r)d2ψdr2+(ω2(1−2GMc2r)−l(l+1)r2−2GMc2r3)ψ=0.\left(1 – \frac{2GM}{c^2r}\right) \frac{d^2 \psi}{dr^2} + \left( \frac{\omega^2}{\left(1 – \frac{2GM}{c^2r}\right)} – \frac{l(l+1)}{r^2} – \frac{2GM}{c^2r^3} \right) \psi = 0.

This is a second-order differential equation for ψ(r)\psi(r), which describes how the scalar field propagates in the Schwarzschild spacetime.

5. Potential Term: The term:

V(r)=(1−2GMc2r)(l(l+1)r2+2GMc2r3),V(r) = \left(1 – \frac{2GM}{c^2r}\right) \left( \frac{l(l+1)}{r^2} + \frac{2GM}{c^2r^3} \right),

acts as an effective potential for the radial part of the wave equation.

Summary

  • The Schwarzschild solution describes the spacetime geometry around a non-rotating, uncharged black hole.
  • The scalar wave equation in this background can be solved using separation of variables, leading to a radial equation with an effective potential.
  • These solutions provide insights into the behavior of fields and waves in the vicinity of a black hole.

 

The post Scalar Wave Equation in a Schwarzschild Background appeared first on Time Travel, Quantum Entanglement and Quantum Computing.

]]>
Compactified versus non compactified Kaluza-Klein Theories https://stationarystates.com/general-relativity-and-cosmology/compactified-versus-non-compactified-kaluza-klein-theories/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=compactified-versus-non-compactified-kaluza-klein-theories Wed, 05 Jun 2024 01:42:54 +0000 https://stationarystates.com/?p=424 Kaluza-Klein Gravity – by J. M. Overduin and P. S. Wesson Compactified Kaluza-Klein Theories Definition and Mechanism: In compactified Kaluza-Klein theories, the extra dimensions are curled up into very small […]

The post Compactified versus non compactified Kaluza-Klein Theories appeared first on Time Travel, Quantum Entanglement and Quantum Computing.

]]>
Kaluza-Klein Gravity – by J. M. Overduin and P. S. Wesson

Compactified Kaluza-Klein Theories

  1. Definition and Mechanism:
    • In compactified Kaluza-Klein theories, the extra dimensions are curled up into very small sizes, typically below the scale of 10−1810^{-18} meters​​.
    • These extra dimensions form a compact manifold which must be a solution to the higher-dimensional Einstein field equations​​.
  2. Challenges:
    • The combination of macroscopic four-dimensional spacetime with the compactified extra-dimensional space must be a solution of the higher-dimensional field equations, which is straightforward in simpler cases but complex in higher dimensions​​.
    • The process of compactification often requires additional fields or modifications to the Einstein equations, sacrificing some of the elegance of a purely geometrical theory​​.
    • There is a need for matter fields to achieve compactification, and in some theories, these fields must be added by hand, which departs from the original goal of explaining all forces and matter geometrically​​.
  3. Importance and Developments:
    • Compactification has led to significant developments in higher-dimensional unified physics, including supergravity and superstring theory​​.
    • Mechanisms like spontaneous compactification, influenced by additional fields or higher-dimensional cosmological constants, have become standard approaches​​.

Non-Compactified Kaluza-Klein Theories

  1. Definition:
    • Non-compactified Kaluza-Klein theories consider the extra dimensions as real and extended, not curled up​​.
    • These theories often still use the term “Kaluza-Klein,” even though the dimensions are not compactified, which is somewhat contradictory to the original definition​​.
  2. Challenges:
    • There is a lack of discussion on conformal rescaling in non-compactified theories because the extra dimensions are considered physically real and potentially observable​​.
    • Ensuring that the physical implications of these extended dimensions align with observations and do not contradict known physics is a significant challenge​​.

Summary of Key Points

  • Compactified theories require extra dimensions to be compactified, which involves additional fields and modifications to fit the higher-dimensional field equations. These theories have driven much of the progress in high-dimensional unification theories.
  • Non-compactified theories maintain extended extra dimensions but face different challenges in ensuring these dimensions are consistent with physical observations and are less discussed in terms of conformal rescaling.

The document provides a broad overview of both approaches, comparing their advantages and limitations within the context of higher-dimensional unified gravity theories.

The post Compactified versus non compactified Kaluza-Klein Theories appeared first on Time Travel, Quantum Entanglement and Quantum Computing.

]]>
Kaluza-Klein theory and general relativity https://stationarystates.com/cosmology/kaluza-klein-theory-and-general-relativity/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=kaluza-klein-theory-and-general-relativity Wed, 05 Jun 2024 01:40:55 +0000 https://stationarystates.com/?p=423 The relationship between Kaluza-Klein theory and general relativity is a foundational aspect of the former. Kaluza-Klein theory extends general relativity by incorporating additional dimensions beyond the familiar four-dimensional spacetime. Here […]

The post Kaluza-Klein theory and general relativity appeared first on Time Travel, Quantum Entanglement and Quantum Computing.

]]>
The relationship between Kaluza-Klein theory and general relativity is a foundational aspect of the former. Kaluza-Klein theory extends general relativity by incorporating additional dimensions beyond the familiar four-dimensional spacetime. Here are some key points from the document regarding this relationship:

  1. Extension of General Relativity: Kaluza-Klein theory applies Einstein’s general theory of relativity to a five-dimensional spacetime manifold instead of the usual four dimensions. This is done without introducing a five-dimensional energy-momentum tensor, implying that the universe in higher dimensions is considered empty. This idea aligns with Kaluza’s first key assumption: to explain matter in four dimensions as a manifestation of pure geometry in higher dimensions​​.
  2. Generalized Einstein Equations: In the Kaluza-Klein framework, the Einstein equations are generalized to five dimensions. The equations G^AB=0Ĝ_{AB} = 0 or R^AB=0R̂_{AB} = 0, where G^ABĜ_{AB} and R^ABR̂_{AB} are the five-dimensional Einstein and Ricci tensors, respectively, reflect this higher-dimensional perspective【12:​​. Minimal Extension and Physical Interpretation: The five-dimensional Ricci tensor and Christoffel symbols are defined similarly to their four-dimensional counterparts, which can lead to significant departures from general relativity. However, these departures have not been widely observed in typical tests conducted within the solar system. The sun, for instance, is very close to the Schwarzschild limit, leading to minimal deviations from general relativity in observed solar phenomena【12:​​. Noncompactified Kaluza-Klein Theory and Astrophysical Implications: Noncompactified Kaluza-Klein theory, where higher-dimensional dependencies are allowed, offers new insights into cosmology and astrophysics. For example, in the context of noncompactified Kaluza-Klein cosmology, phenomena like the big bang, Hubble expansion, and microwave background can be reinterpreted as geometrical illusions—artifacts of coordinate choices in the higher-dimensional universe【12:​​n summary, Kaluza-Klein theory builds upon and extends general relativity by incorporating additional spatial dimensions, leading to a unified framework that can describe both gravitational and electromagnetic forces within a higher-dimensional spacetime. This relationship allows for a richer theoretical structure that provides new perspectives on cosmological and astrophysical phenomena.

The post Kaluza-Klein theory and general relativity appeared first on Time Travel, Quantum Entanglement and Quantum Computing.

]]>
Hawking Radiation and Black Hole Thermodynamics https://stationarystates.com/general-relativity-and-cosmology/hawking-radiation-and-black-hole-thermodynamics/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=hawking-radiation-and-black-hole-thermodynamics Sat, 01 Jun 2024 23:18:21 +0000 https://stationarystates.com/?p=412 The document titled “Hawking Radiation and Black Hole Thermodynamics” by Don N. Page provides a comprehensive review of the theoretical developments in the understanding of black holes, focusing on their […]

The post Hawking Radiation and Black Hole Thermodynamics appeared first on Time Travel, Quantum Entanglement and Quantum Computing.

]]>
The document titled “Hawking Radiation and Black Hole Thermodynamics” by Don N. Page provides a comprehensive review of the theoretical developments in the understanding of black holes, focusing on their thermal properties and the associated radiation. Here are the key points covered in the paper:

  1. Historical Background:
    • Black holes are described as perfectly thermal objects, but their microscopic degrees of freedom leading to thermal behavior are not fully understood.
    • The classical four laws of black hole mechanics have analogues in thermodynamics:
      • Zeroth Law: Surface gravity is constant over the event horizon, analogous to the constant temperature in thermal equilibrium.
      • First Law: Relates changes in mass, area, angular momentum, and charge of the black hole, analogous to the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation).
      • Second Law: Hawking’s area theorem states that the area of the black hole horizon cannot decrease, analogous to the entropy of a closed system not decreasing.
      • Third Law: The surface gravity cannot be reduced to zero, analogous to the impossibility of reaching absolute zero temperature.
  2. Bekenstein-Hawking Entropy:
    • Bekenstein proposed that black holes have an entropy proportional to their area.
    • Hawking’s discovery of black hole radiation provided the exact relationship, leading to the Bekenstein-Hawking entropy formula: Sbh=14AS_{\text{bh}} = \frac{1}{4} A (in Planck units).
  3. Hawking Radiation:
    • Black holes emit radiation with a thermal spectrum, known as Hawking radiation.
    • This radiation implies that black holes have a temperature proportional to their surface gravity.
    • The temperature of a black hole is given by T=κ2πT = \frac{\kappa}{2\pi}, where κ\kappa is the surface gravity.
  4. Particle Creation and Quantum Effects:
    • The emission of particles from black holes was linked to earlier work on particle creation in expanding universes.
    • Concepts like Bogoliubov transformations were used to understand particle creation in time-dependent geometries.
  5. Quantum Field Theory in Curved Spacetime:
    • Detailed calculations of field theory in the context of black hole spacetimes were performed.
    • These calculations showed that black holes emit radiation as if they were thermal bodies.
  6. Implications and Discussions:
    • The paper discusses the implications of Hawking radiation on the understanding of black holes and their entropy.
    • It explores how these findings challenge previous notions and open new avenues for research in black hole thermodynamics and quantum gravity.

This review highlights the significant milestones in understanding the thermal nature of black holes and the groundbreaking discovery of Hawking radiation, which provides a deeper insight into the interplay between quantum mechanics, thermodynamics, and general relativity.

The post Hawking Radiation and Black Hole Thermodynamics appeared first on Time Travel, Quantum Entanglement and Quantum Computing.

]]>
Creating black holes and baby Universes in a lab https://stationarystates.com/general-relativity-and-cosmology/creating-black-holes-and-baby-universes-in-a-lab/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=creating-black-holes-and-baby-universes-in-a-lab Fri, 23 Jul 2021 14:39:56 +0000 https://stationarystates.com/?p=176 Take a solid sphere and compress it. The Internal High Density will cause a negative pressure (dense on the inside, pulling the outside in) This will lead to an implosion. […]

The post Creating black holes and baby Universes in a lab appeared first on Time Travel, Quantum Entanglement and Quantum Computing.

]]>
  • Take a solid sphere and compress it.
  • The Internal High Density will cause a negative pressure (dense on the inside, pulling the outside in)
  • This will lead to an implosion.
  • The result is a black hole.

    Along with the black hole, in certain events, the black hole creation event can, with non zero probability, create a baby universe.

     

    The post Creating black holes and baby Universes in a lab appeared first on Time Travel, Quantum Entanglement and Quantum Computing.

    ]]>