Time Dependence of Quantum Mechanical Operators

In quantum mechanics, the time dependence of operators depends on which representation (picture) we use — primarily the Schrödinger picture or the Heisenberg picture.
Both are equivalent, but they treat the time evolution of states and operators differently.


1. Schrödinger Picture

In the Schrödinger picture:

  • The operators are typically time-independent (unless they explicitly depend on time, like a time-varying potential).
  • The state vectors evolve with time according to the Schrödinger equation.

    \[ i\hbar \frac{\partial}{\partial t}|\psi_S(t)\rangle = \hat{H} |\psi_S(t)\rangle \]

If an operator itself depends explicitly on time (e.g., an external driving field), then its time dependence is just that explicit one.

    \[ \frac{d}{dt}\langle \hat{A} \rangle = \frac{1}{i\hbar}\langle [\hat{A},\hat{H}] \rangle + \left\langle \frac{\partial \hat{A}}{\partial t} \right\rangle \]


2. Heisenberg Picture

In the Heisenberg picture, the situation is reversed:

  • The state vectors are constant in time (frozen at their initial value).
  • The operators carry all the time dependence.

The operator evolution is given by the Heisenberg equation of motion:

    \[ \frac{d\hat{A}_H}{dt} = \frac{1}{i\hbar}[\hat{A}_H, \hat{H}] + \left(\frac{\partial \hat{A}_H}{\partial t}\right) \]

The solution can also be expressed as a similarity transformation using the time-evolution operator \hat{U}(t) = e^{-\frac{i}{\hbar}\hat{H}t}:

    \[ \hat{A}_H(t) = \hat{U}^\dagger(t)\,\hat{A}_S\,\hat{U}(t) \]


3. Examples

(a) Free Particle Momentum and Position

For a free particle with Hamiltonian \hat{H} = \frac{\hat{p}^2}{2m}:

    \[ \frac{d\hat{p}_H}{dt} = \frac{1}{i\hbar}[\hat{p},\hat{H}] = 0 \quad \Rightarrow \quad \hat{p}_H(t) = \hat{p}(0) \]

    \[ \frac{d\hat{x}_H}{dt} = \frac{1}{i\hbar}[\hat{x},\hat{H}] = \frac{\hat{p}}{m} \quad \Rightarrow \quad \hat{x}_H(t) = \hat{x}(0) + \frac{\hat{p}(0)}{m}t \]

This is a quantum analogue of classical motion with constant momentum and linearly increasing position.


(b) Harmonic Oscillator

For a 1D harmonic oscillator with \hat{H} = \frac{\hat{p}^2}{2m} + \frac{1}{2}m\omega^2\hat{x}^2:

    \[ \frac{d\hat{x}_H}{dt} = \frac{\hat{p}_H}{m}, \quad \frac{d\hat{p}_H}{dt} = -m\omega^2 \hat{x}_H \]

Combining gives:

    \[ \frac{d^2\hat{x}_H}{dt^2} + \omega^2 \hat{x}_H = 0 \]

Solution:

    \[ \hat{x}_H(t) = \hat{x}(0)\cos(\omega t) + \frac{\hat{p}(0)}{m\omega}\sin(\omega t) \]

    \[ \hat{p}_H(t) = \hat{p}(0)\cos(\omega t) - m\omega \hat{x}(0)\sin(\omega t) \]

This again mirrors classical oscillatory motion but with operator-valued amplitudes.


(c) Spin Precession in a Magnetic Field

For a spin-\tfrac{1}{2} particle in a magnetic field \vec{B} = B\hat{z}, the Hamiltonian is

    \[ \hat{H} = -\gamma B \hat{S}_z \]

Then:

    \[ \frac{d\hat{S}_x}{dt} = \frac{1}{i\hbar}[\hat{S}_x, \hat{H}] = \gamma B \hat{S}_y \]

    \[ \frac{d\hat{S}_y}{dt} = -\gamma B \hat{S}_x \]

So the spin components precess:

    \[ \hat{S}_x(t) = \hat{S}_x(0)\cos(\omega_L t) + \hat{S}_y(0)\sin(\omega_L t) \]

    \[ \hat{S}_y(t) = \hat{S}_y(0)\cos(\omega_L t) - \hat{S}_x(0)\sin(\omega_L t) \]

where \omega_L = \gamma B is the Larmor frequency.


4. Summary

Picture State Operator Equation of Motion
Schrödinger i\hbar \frac{\partial}{\partial t}|\psi\rangle = \hat{H}|\psi\rangle Usually time-independent \frac{d}{dt}\langle \hat{A} \rangle = \frac{1}{i\hbar}\langle [\hat{A},\hat{H}] \rangle + \langle \partial_t \hat{A} \rangle
Heisenberg Time-independent \hat{A}_H(t)=e^{\frac{i}{\hbar}\hat{H}t}\hat{A}e^{-\frac{i}{\hbar}\hat{H}t} \frac{d\hat{A}_H}{dt}=\frac{1}{i\hbar}[\hat{A}_H,\hat{H}] + \partial_t \hat{A}_H

Thus, in quantum mechanics, operators evolve in time via commutators with the Hamiltonian, reflecting the deep correspondence between quantum and classical dynamics (where [A,H]/(i\hbar) parallels the classical Poisson bracket \{A,H\}).