Gleason’s theorem with examples
Gleason’s Theorem Explained Using Single-Particle and Two-Particle Systems
Read this post on Projection Operators first.
1. What Is Gleason’s Theorem?
Gleason’s theorem states that in a Hilbert space of dimension , the only valid probability measure for quantum measurements must follow the Born rule:
where:
is the probability of measuring outcome
.
is a **projection operator** representing a measurement.
is the **density matrix** of the quantum state.
2. Single-Particle Spin Measurement
Consider a spin- particle (like an electron) measured along the
-axis.
Spin Observable 
The spin operator is:
The possible measured values (eigenvalues) are:
(Spin up,
)
(Spin down,
)
Projection Operators
Each measurement outcome corresponds to a projection operator:
Measurement Probabilities
If the quantum state is , the measurement probabilities are:
Single-Particle Measurement Diagram
Spin Measurement Device (Stern-Gerlach) | ↑ ( +ℏ/2 ) | ↓ ( -ℏ/2 ) --------------------->-------------------- |ψ⟩ = α|+⟩ + β|−⟩
3. Two-Particle Entangled State
Consider two spin- particles in the Bell state:
Observable: Total Spin Along
-Axis
The total spin operator is:
The possible measured values are:
(both particles spin up)
(both particles spin down)
(one up, one down)
Measurement Probabilities
For the Bell state , Gleason’s theorem ensures that the measurement outcomes must obey:
Entanglement Measurement Diagram
Particle A Particle B ----------- ----------- | +⟩ -⟩ | | +⟩ -⟩ | ------------------ ------------------ | Bell State: |Φ+⟩ = 1/√2 (|+⟩|+⟩ + |−⟩|−⟩) | | If A is measured as +ℏ/2, then B must be +ℏ/2. | If A is measured as -ℏ/2, then B must be -ℏ/2.
4. Conclusion
- Gleason’s theorem proves that quantum measurement probabilities must follow the Born rule.
- Any attempt to assign classical probabilities to measurement outcomes contradicts the additivity condition.
- This rules out non-contextual hidden-variable theories and reinforces the fundamental role of quantum uncertainty.
Leave a Reply